Home
About
Who Are We
History
Services
Building Disputes Tribunal Panel
Client Survey and Feedback Form
Make an Enquiry
Construction Contracts Act
Does the Act apply?
Key Definitions
Introduction to the Payment Regime
Adjudication
Residential Construction Contracts
Suspension of Construction Work
Get a copy of the Act
Adjudication
Apply for the Nomination of an Adjudicator
What is Adjudication
Who can use Adjudication
Building Disputes Tribunal Adjudication Service
The Adjudication Process
Costs of an Adjudication
Charging Orders
Disputes of less than $50,000
Adjudication Panel
Client Survey & Feedback Form - Adjudication
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Arbitration
Expert Determination
Mediation
Resources
BuildLaw
Court Decisions
Legislation
Articles and Papers
Forms & Precedents
Australian Cases
David Hollands' Memorial Collection
Contact
Home
About
Who Are We
History
Services
Adjudication
Arbitration
Mediation
BuildSafe Security
Building Disputes Tribunal Panel
Adjudication Panel
John Green
Sir Ian Barker QC
Tony Dean
Derek Firth
Andrew Hazelton
Tomas Kennedy-Grant QC
John Walton
Sherwyn Williams
Trina Lincoln
Noel Casey
Peter Degerholm
Peter Fehl
Barbara Hunt
Scott Galloway
Peter Jones
Richard Maiden
Peter Phillips
Victoria Whitfield
Trevor Thompson
Process for Appointment of Adjudicators
Professional Standards of Adjudicators
Applying to join the Building Disputes Tribunal Panel of Adjudicators
Client Survey and Feedback Form
Make an Enquiry
Construction Contracts Act
Does the Act apply?
Key Definitions
Definition of Construction Work
Residential Construction Contract
Residential Occupier
Working Day
Associate
Contract Price
Introduction to the Payment Regime
Progress Payments
Payment Claims
Payment Schedules
Consequences of not paying claimed amount
Adjudication
Residential Construction Contracts
Suspension of Construction Work
Get a copy of the Act
Adjudication
Apply for the Nomination of an Adjudicator
What is Adjudication
Who can use Adjudication
Building Disputes Tribunal Adjudication Service
Building Disputes Step by Step
Process for Appointment of Adjudicators
Application to Use the Adjudication Service
Professional Standards of Adjudicators
The Adjudication Process
Notice of Adjudication
Precedent Notice of Adjudication
Jurisdiction
Jurisdiction of adjudicator
Selection of the adjudicator
Security for the Fees and Expenses of the Adjudicator
How does Building Disputes Tribunal select the Adjudicator
Agreement between the parties as to the adjudicator
The Adjudication Claim
Service of the Claim and Response
The Adjudication Response
The Determination
Adjudicator's powers
Enforcing an Adjudicator's Determination
Entry as Judgment
Evidence
Witness Statements
Commencing an Adjudication
Costs of an Adjudication
Legal Fees and Expenses
Adjudicator Fees and Expenses
Payment of Adjudication Costs
Interest
GST
Schedule of Security Required
Charging Orders
Associate
Obtaining Charging Orders
Disputes of less than $50,000
Schedule of Fees
Adjudication Panel
Client Survey & Feedback Form - Adjudication
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Arbitration
Expert Determination
Mediation
Mediation Agreement
Mediation Protocol
Client Survey & Feedback Form - Mediation
Resources
BuildLaw
Issue 1, March 2009
Issue 2, June 2009
Issue 3 September 2009
Issue 4 December 2009
Issue 5 March 2010
Issue 6 June 2010
Court Decisions
NZ High Court 2005
NZ High Court 2006
NZ High Court 2007
NZ High Court 2008
NZ High Court 2009
NZ High Court 2010
NZ District Court Decisions 2004-2007
Australian Decisions 2009
Australian Decisions 2006-2008
Australian Decisions 2004-2006
NZ District Court Decisions 2008- 2009
UK Decisions
NZ COURT OF APPEAL
Legislation
Articles and Papers
Latest News
Forms & Precedents
Payment Claim
Payment Schedule
Application to Nominate an Adjudicator
Notice of Adjudication
Adjudication Claim
Notice to Suspend Works
Residential Occupier Form
Our Committment to You
Australian Cases
David Hollands' Memorial Collection
Contact
Client Survey and Feedback Form
Name
Company/Organisation
Building Disputes Tribunal Reference Number: BDT-
Please Select the Box that Applies to you:
Claimant
Respondent
Claimant's representative
Respondent's representative
Other
How did you find out about our services?
Please Select
Our website
A magazine article
A letter from us
A seminar/presentation
Yellow Pages
Our Brochure
A Trade Organisation
A Professional Body
A Professional Advisor
Used the Tribunal's services previously
Other
Our Support Team
Our people were courteous and helpful
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
A timely response was provided
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
My overall experience was positive
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
Our people were knowledgeable and provided answers to your questions
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
Any comments about our support team
Information and Documentation
Our website is comprehensive and informative
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
Our website is easy to navigate
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
Learning about adjudication on our website was relatively quick and easy
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
Our application form for the nomination of an adjudicator was easy to follow and complete
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
I prefer to file as much information and complete as many forms as I can on-line
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
Having access to all of the necessary forms for compliance with the Act on the website is useful
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
Having access to statistics relating to adjudication is important
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
Having access to the judgments of the courts relating to adjudication is important
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
Having access to articles and publications relevant to construction law is important
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
Any other comments about our information and documentation
Nomination and Adjudication Service
The Adjudicator was nominated promptly
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
Having a panel of Principal Adjudicators to deal with claims over $100,000 is important
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
The jurisdiction of the general panel at less than $100,000 is appropriate
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
I would choose which ANA I used because of the adjudicators on its panel
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
Being able to secure the appointment of an adjudicator within 24 hours is important to me
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
The case managment service provided by the Tribunal is important
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
Having an experienced construction lawyer as Registrar to administer and provide guidance on the process is important
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
Knowing that the adjudication process will be the same for each adjudicator is important
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
Knowing that the same documentation will be used by each adjudicator is important (ie Notice of Willingness to Act)
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
Knowing the amount of security required from the outset is important
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
The FIXED FEE LOW VALUE CLAIM SERVICE provided by the Tribunal is important
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
Having NO NOMINATION FEE for the appointment of an adjudicator is important
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
The facility to pay the adjudicator's fees and expenses by credit card is important
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
The 'scrutiny as to form' of all determinations by a Principal Adjudicator is an important safeguard for the parties
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
I found the adjudicator courteous and professional
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
Any other comments
The Adjudication and the Determination
The determination was made promptly
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
The form of the determination made it easy to follow
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
The adjudicator's reasoning was easy to follow
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
The outcome of the adjudication was as I expected
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
The cost of the determination was reasonable in the circumstances
Select One
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No Comment
Any other comments
Other
Would you recommend our Adjudication Service to others?
Yes
No
As a result of your experience, what improvements to our service would you suggest
As a result of your experience, what improvements to the Act would you suggest