By the Minister for Building and Construction, Jenny Salesa

I’m proud of our building and construction industry, and the hard-working individuals that fill the wide and varied roles that make up the sector. It’s our fifth-largest industry by GDP and fourth-largest employer, accounting for nearly 10% of the workforce.

As a Government, we’re also dependent on a high performing construction industry to deliver the quality homes, schools and hospitals that we know are a central requirement for the wellbeing of all New Zealanders.

The sector is growing at a faster rate than much of our economy. However, it also faces a number of long-standing problems that are holding it back.  These range from low productivity and inefficient practices and processes, to skills and labour shortages, and poor health and safety.

I want to make sure our construction sector is something that we can continue to be proud of – a sector that is healthy and sustainable, and meets the needs of New Zealanders.  We want to make sure quality is lifted, so things go right the first time, and, there are fairer outcomes if things do go wrong.

This is the basis of the proposals in the Building System Legislative Reform Programme.

What’s being proposed in the Reform Programme?

Over the past year, MBIE officials spoke with people across the sector about problems with how the regulatory system functions.  The conversations revealed three common themes:

  • Roles and responsibilities are not clear.
  • Information isn’t available when it’s needed.
  • It’s difficult to hold people to account for the quality of their work.

As a result, a package of proposed reforms was developed, making up the most significant reforms since the Building Act was introduced in 2004. The aim is to create a high-performing sector that delivers safe and durable buildings, builds it right the first time, and has an efficient regulatory system that people have confidence in.

The changes proposed are wide ranging and affect most parts of the building system. Here’s a brief summary of the five key areas where changes are proposed:

Building products and methods

With around 600,000 building products available on the New Zealand market, it’s important that regulations help people choose products that meet the performance requirements of the Building Code. The current regulatory settings for building products have gaps and disincentives that make the system less efficient and slow down the building consent process.

The system also isn’t optimised for modern methods of construction, such as off-site manufacture, which are playing an increasingly important role in the sector.

The proposed changes include:

  • requiring building manufacturers and suppliers (including importers) to provide a minimum level of publicly accessible information about their products, so that better decisions can be made about what products will comply with the Building Code
  • placing an explicit responsibility on manufacturers and suppliers to ensure a building product is fit for its intended purpose, so they can be held accountable if it fails due to the way it was designed or manufactured
  • making consenting easier for modern methods of construction such as off-site manufacture.
Occupational regulation

Occupational regulation aims to protect the public from harm by ensuring services are performed with reasonable care and skill. However, currently the occupational regulatory system doesn’t capture all of the risks in the building process. It’s not always clear that the people authorised to carry out restricted work are competent, and there are challenges to holding people to account for substandard work or poor conduct.

The three occupations where we see the most pressing need for change are licensed building practitioners, engineers, and plumbers, gasfitters and drainlayers.

The proposed changes include:

  • changing the licensed building practitioners scheme to raise competence standards and broaden the definition of restricted building work.
  • introducing a new licensing scheme for engineers and restricting who can carry out safety-critical engineering work
  • removing exemptions that allow unlicensed people to carry out plumbing, gasfitting and drainlaying work.
Risk and liability

We know that building work doesn’t always go right, and that fairer outcomes are needed when things go wrong.

The proposed changes include:

  • requiring a guarantee or insurance product for residential new builds and significant alterations, allowing homeowners to actively opt out of it.
  • leaving the liability settings for building consent authorities unchanged.

Proposing not to change the liability settings for BCAs was based on a finely balanced assessment.  A cap on liability would only support BCAs, it wouldn’t support others in the system. However, this assessment relies on other proposals in the package being successful to make sure risks in the building process are well managed.

Building levy

The building levy is payable by building owners or developers on successful building consent applications for projects that are worth more than a specified amount. The revenue from the levy is used to fund a range of Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) functions and activities under the Building Act.

The current levy is higher than it needs to be, so it’s proposed to:

  • reduce it from $2.01 to $1.50, to bring it in line with Treasury’s best practice guidelines
  • standardise the threshold to which the levy applies, to $20,444 including GST
  • allow MBIE to spend the funds raised by the building levy on broader stewardship of the building sector.
Offences, penalties and public notification

It’s important that enforcement agencies have enough time to investigate possible offences, the consequences are fair in proportion to the offence, and the penalties are different for individuals and organisations.

Proposals include:

  • increasing the maximum financial penalties.
  • setting different maximum penalties for individuals and organisations.
  • extending the time enforcement agencies can lay a charge from six months to 12 months.
  • modifying the definition of ‘publicly notify’ in section 7 of the Building Act to reflect the changes in the way people access information.
Next steps

The consultation process for the Reform Programme closed on 16 June.

There’s still a lot of work that needs to be done.  MBIE officials will be analysing the submissions received and using that information to refine the proposals to ensure the best outcomes for all New Zealanders.  I will then decide what changes to recommend to Cabinet.

At some point, a summary of the submissions will be available on the MBIE website.

To keep up to date with what’s happening in the Reform Programme, you can join the mailing list on the Building.govt website.



Construction Disputes – Are they on the rise?

A survey of construction industry members by Russell McVeagh has revealed that almost 61 percent of respondents are predicting an increase in the number of disputes. Some causes of a rise are within parties’ control, such as relationships, risk allocation and contract...

BuildLaw Issue 40

In this issue we look at the basis on which interest can be claimed in construction contract disputes and we discuss the changes announced by the government in April to stimulate the construction and infrastructure sectors post COVID-19. We feature an insightful...

Bought a house – got problems – no one wants to know?

Author: Hannah Stanley, Building Disputes Tribunal Registrar As a homeowner, discovering structural defects in your home is the last thing you want and most wonder where to go from there in terms of their rights and how to remedy the situation. The Courts are often a...

Assessing sums payable in the absence of a contract: Electrix Limited v The Fletcher Construction Company Limited [2020] NZHC 918

Authored by Michael Taylor, Joanna Trezise (Russell McVeagh), and Belinda Green (NZDRC) In a decision released on 6 May 2020, the High Court ordered The Fletcher Construction Company Limited to pay its subcontractor Electrix Limited about $7.5 million, plus GST and...

BuildLaw Issue 39

In this issue we look at the government guidelines for NZS3910:2013 contracts affected by Covid-19 Alert level 4 restrictions. We discuss adjudication injunctions caused by the virus and how they may help to provide some clarity to a rather cloudy area of law. We look...

BuildLaw Issue 38

December 2019 In this issue we look at a dispute over a home renovation contract that travelled all the way to the South Australian Supreme Court, highlighting the risks of not dealing with disputes promptly. We examine the ‘Emerald Book’ released earlier this year by...

Adjudication: calculating time over the Christmas period 2019-2020

What are the non-working days over the Christmas period this year?

The builder’s right to fix

Introduction When a dispute over defective building work turns ugly, the owner is sometimes tempted to refuse the builder the opportunity of returning to rectify the defects.  There are risks in this course.  This update considers a recent NSW Supreme Court decision...

The ‘collaborative’ future of construction and infrastructure procurement

Framework Contracting, that is well planned from the outset, can be an effective tool to deliver an entire programme of infrastructure with benefits for all sides. While it is simply one way to address resource constraints and the need for fair apportionment of risk...

Case In-Brief: Hybrid contracts and the payment provisions of the Construction Act

The Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1998 (the Act) applies to “construction operations”. Where a contract relates to both “construction operations” and non-construction operations, the question arises of how payment mechanisms apply to construction...

BuildLaw Issue 37

October 2019 In this issue, we look at a NSW Supreme Court decision in White Constructions Pty Ltd v PBS Holdings Pty Ltd [2019] which found that the claimant, despite using an expert programmer, failed to sufficiently prove that a delay by the respondent caused delay...

The Supreme Court reinstatement is not a right that can be assigned

The Supreme Court has had the final say on the status of 'on sold' earthquake damaged properties insured by IAG at the time of the Canterbury earthquakes. In a judgment released yesterday, the Supreme Court by 3:2 majority, decided that owners of on sold properties...

Contractual appendices: ignore at your peril

Recently, a subcontractor in the UK was relieved of adverse ground conditions risk, despite contract amendments that sought to allocate that risk to the subcontractor- and it all hinged on an analysis of appendices to the contract. Appending documents to a contract...

New Government Procurement Rules Announced (4th Edition)

The 4th edition of the Government Procurement Rules (Rules) were published this month. They are the good practice standards for government procurement, and were last substantially revised in March 2015. The Rules apply to all public service departments, police,...

Building Law reforms: Raising the bar across the sector

By the Minister for Building and Construction, Jenny Salesa I’m proud of our building and construction industry, and the hard-working individuals that fill the wide and varied roles that make up the sector. It’s our fifth-largest industry by GDP and fourth-largest...

BuildLaw Issue 36

July 2019 In this issue we feature an article by the honourable Minister for Building and Construction, Jenny Salesa, with an invaluable insight on the proposed Building Law Reform Programme. In Case in Brief, Jeremy Glover makes a commentary on two recent...

BuildLaw Issue 35

April 2019 In this issue, we feature an article on the warning apartment owners may take from the recent Court of Appeal decision in Body Corporate S73368 v Otway. This decision creates some financial uncertainty for owners who could now be liable for repair costs to...

When can you go to Adjudication?

Under section 25 of the Act, any party to a construction contract is entitled to refer a dispute arising under that construction contract to adjudication except where the parties have agreed to refer disputes between them to arbitration and the arbitration is an...

Alliancing: what does the new NEC4 Alliance Contract have to offer?

By Claire King Fenwick Elliott LLPIn June 2018 the NEC published its first Alliance Contract “designed for use on major projects or programmes of work where longer-term collaborative ways of working are to be created”.[1] In this Insight we examine what is meant by...

BuildLaw Issue 34

December 2018 In this issue we investigate how the new retentions regime stacked up  in its first court case, in the Wellington High Court. We look at the new NEC4 Alliance Contract, trends in Asian leisure and hospitality, liquidated damages and receivables projects,...

Neutral Evaluation Revisited

by Royden Hindle [1] Neutral evaluation is a relatively little-used tool in the dispute resolution toolbox. Certainly, it has potential drawbacks: a party who is disappointed by an evaluator’s assessment may be slow to accept the outcome, while a party who feels...

A brief introduction to Adjudication

What is adjudication? Adjudication is a unique fast track statutory dispute resolution process or resolving building and construction disputes under the Act. It is the most commonly used dispute resolution process for resolving such disputes. Adjudication is quick and...

Initiating Adjudication: The Notice of Adjudication

Initiating Adjudication: Back to Basics   Part One: The Notice of Adjudication The preparation of the Notice of Adjudication is arguably the most important step in the Adjudication process under the Construction Contracts Act (the Act). It is that document...

Dispute Review Boards: a brief overview

Dispute Review Boards are known by many names. They are often referred to as Dispute Boards, Dispute Avoidance Boards, Dispute Adjudication Boards and Dispute Resolution Boards. Whatever their name, they have become a standard dispute...

Initiating Adjudication: Service of the Notice of Adjudication

Initiating Adjudication: Back to Basics   Part Two: Service of the Notice of Adjudication You have your Notice of Adjudication prepared, but what steps do you need to take to serve it? This note sets out in brief the requirements for service under the...

Initiating Adjudication: Appointing an Adjudicator

Initiating Adjudication: Back to Basics Part Three: Appointing an Adjudicator Following on from Part Two of our three-part series on initiating adjudication, in this note we briefly look at how to appoint an adjudicator under the Construction Contracts Act (the Act)....

BuildLaw Issue 33

November 2018 In this issue we feature delay analysis. We also look at challenging an adjudication determination in various jurisdictions, the perennial chestnut - who are the parties to the contract? force majeure clauses and causation, current problems besetting the...

BuildLaw Issue 32

June 2018 In this issue we feature 'no oral variation clauses in light of the recent UK Supreme Court decision in Rock Advertising v MWB. We also look at the Grenfell Tower Report and the suspension by MBIE of six CodeMark Certificates relating to ACPs, the...

Retentions – maxed out

Common retentions provisions in subcontracts may be unenforceable. In Maxcon Constructions Pty Ltd v Vadasz [2018] HCA 5, the High Court of Australia recently held that on its proper construction, the retention provisions in a subcontract that made...

BuildLaw Issue 31

March 2018 In this issue we feature the approach to judicial review of adjudicator's determinations taken by the courts in NSW and New Zealand. We also look at on-demand v conditional bonds, pitfalls of drafting a subsequent agreement on an underlying contract, the...

BuildLaw Issue 30

Dec 2017 In this issue we feature the Singapore Mataban case where the court confirms an adjudicator's decision to disregard an invalid payment response. We also look at the issue of non-conforming cladding that became notorious with the Grenfell Tower fire. Rebecca...

BuildLaw Issue 29

September 2017 In this issue we feature some of the challenges that are the hallmark of oral construction contracts. We also look at whether a duty of good faith applies to granting extensions of time, how final and binding is an expert determination, how not to amend...

BuildLaw Issue 28

June 2017 In this issue we feature natural justice and adjudications. We also look at representative defect claims and exclusion clauses, further amendments to the Arbitration Act, and the recent New Zealand Court of Appeals decisions in Ebert Construction v Sansom...

BuildLaw Issue 27

March 2017 In this issue we feature new changes to the Construction Contracts Act - the new statutory trust model for retentions which came into force on 31 March 2017 including the late introduction of a 'complying instrument' option as a means of protecting...

BuildLaw Issue 26

December 2016 In this issue we feature recent and imminent changes to the Construction Contracts Act - consultants included as from 1 September 2016 and a new statutory trust model for retentions comes into force on 31 March 2017. We also look at the 'Cinderella of...

BuildLaw Issue 25

September 2016 In this issue we feature "The Penalties Doctrine in International Construction Contracting: Where to from here?" - a paper delivered by Professor Doug Jones AO to the Society of Construction Law New Zealand Inc. in August of this year. We also feature a...

BuildLaw Issue 24

June 2016 In this issue we feature 'Judicial Remedies for Construction Defects: Common Law, Equity or Statute', a paper prepared by Philip Britton and delivered by Philip to the Society of Construction Law New Zealand Inc in March of this year. We also present...

BuildLaw Issue 23

March 2016 In this issue we feature construction professionals with two articles highlighting the risks associated with providing professional services and the standards society expects, and the law demands, of professionals, and a further article highlighting the...