Expert Determination Model Clause

Ensure an effective and proportionate response in the future should a dispute arise
Model Clauses GuideContact Us

Expert Determination is a simple means of binding dispute resolution. Unlike adjudication or arbitration, Expert Determination is not governed by legislation. Expert Determination is a consensual process by which parties to a contract agree to refer matters in dispute to an independent person ‘expert’ to decide.

Looking for a model clause to put in your contract for future disputes? The following clause is recommended:

“In the event of any dispute or difference arising out of or in connection with this contract, or the subject matter of this contract, including any question about its existence, validity or termination, the parties must refer that dispute in the first instance to Expert Determination in accordance with the Expert Determination Rules of the Building Disputes Tribunal.”

Unless the parties intend for Expert Determination to be final and binding, we recommend that the above clause then be followed by the following model arbitration clause:

“If either party is dissatisfied with the expert’s determination, either party may, by service of a Notice of Arbitration, require the matter in dispute to be referred to arbitration in accordance with the Arbitration Rules of the Building Disputes Tribunal.”

If a dispute has already arisen and there is no agreement between the parties to refer the dispute to Expert Determination, the parties may enter into an agreement for those purposes, and the following clause is recommended. The words in square brackets should be deleted/completed, as appropriate.

“[Name of first party] and [Name of second party and Ors] hereinafter referred to as the parties, are parties to a contract entered into on or about [enter date].

 

The parties have agreed that [all matters in dispute between them/the matters in dispute between them set out in the Schedule attached hereto] shall be referred to Expert Determination by [Name of Expert] in accordance with the Agreement for Expert Determination and Rules for Determination of Disputed Matters by Expert of the Building Disputes Tribunal (BDT), which procedures and rules are deemed to be incorporated by reference herein.

 

[if the parties are unable to agree upon the identity of an Expert within [five (5)/ten (10)] working days from the date of this agreement, then the Expert shall be appointed by BDT upon the application of any party.]”

Download our complete guide to model clauses here as a pdf or read online below.

And you think you may have problems with your construction contract?

Jo O’Dea In the recent Australian case of Gemcan Constructions Pty Ltd v Westbourne Grammar School [2022] VSC 6, the Supreme Court of Victoria considered a number of issues concerning a construction payment dispute between the parties.  Technically this case was the...

Vicarious liability and subcontractors

By Sam Dorne Liability in tort depends upon proof of a personal breach of duty, with one true exception, vicarious liability. The law of negligence is generally fault based; a defendant is personally liable only for the defendant’s own negligent acts and omissions....

Limitation for payment claims under construction contracts

By Sam Dorne The decision in Hirst v Dunbar [2022] EWHC 41 (TCC) considers the impact of payment provisions in a construction contract, whether through contract or implied terms, and the commencement of the limitation period for payment claims under the contract. It...

Extensions of time in construction contracts

By Jo O’Dea   In an extension of time claim, blame for the delay was a relevant consideration when assessing what was “fair and reasonable”.   In CAJ v CAI [2021] 5 GCA 102, the Singapore Court of Appeal considered the issue of extensions of time in...

Construction contract procedure and dispute resolution: There really is a reason to pay attention to the boring stuff

By Belinda Green Failure to follow a simple construction contract procedure resulted in a hollow dispute outcome for all in Cairns Building and Construction v Kaminaras. This Queensland case reminds us that contractual processes are not just put there by lawyers to...

BuildLaw Issue 45

March 2022CONTENTS Extensions of time in construction contracts Construction contract procedure and dispute resolution: There really is a reason to pay attention to the boring stuff Principals beware, constructive acceleration is here UK: Important announcement on the...

Laying the foundations: tips on how to mediate high-profile construction disputes

By Hannah Aziz Top tips for mediating high-profile construction disputes: Tip 1: Fail to prepare, prepare to fail As with any legal dispute, preparation is key. There will likely be additional, external pressures in high-profile disputes, including publicity...

Testing the waters: New South Wales Supreme Court considers the prevention principle

By Hannah Aziz  Court provides further confirmation that the prevention principle can be excluded by the terms of a contract.   Introduction Following our recent commentary comparing the operation of the prevention principle in New South Wales and Victoria, the...

Construction contract or product warranty? Not all collateral warranty disputes can be adjudicated

By Belinda Green Collateral warranties might be parasitic on a construction contract, but that doesn’t automatically mean they are one. The individual wording and circumstances need to be considered. In some cases, like in Toppan Holdings Limited v Simply Construction...

When you think the amount of your personal guarantee had a limit – but it didn’t.

In a recent Court of Appeal case, Cancian v Carters [2021] NZCA 397, Carters sought to enforce a personal guarantee against Mr Canican.  The Court dismissed an argument from Mr Cancian that Carters had not notified him that that the limit on his personal guarantee had...