Bathurst Resources Ltd v L & M Coal Holdings Ltd [2021] NZSC 85
The Supreme Court in Bathurst Resources Ltd v L & M Coal Holdings Ltd [2021] NZSC 85 has provided important guidance on how extrinsic evidence and implied terms are used to aid interpretation of contracts.
The Court has agreed that the approach to be taken on interpretation of written contracts is governed by the law of contract and is an objective task. The Court also confirmed that in principle, extrinsic evidence, such as the background context, evidence of prior negotiations and evidence of subsequent conduct, may be admissible when interpreting a contract. The Court has said that relevance and probative value are the touchstones for admissibility of such evidence, in accordance with the framework provided by the Evidence Act 2006. This means, for example, that a blanket rule rendering evidence of pre-contractual negotiations inadmissible is not justifiable.
The Court has found with implying of terms into a contract beyond those expressly agreed, such as to give business efficacy to a contract, an unexpressed term can only be implied if it is strictly necessary, in that the term would spell out what the contract, read against the relevant background, must be understood to mean.
Vicarious liability and subcontractors
Limitation for payment claims under construction contracts
Extensions of time in construction contracts
BuildLaw Issue 45
Testing the waters: New South Wales Supreme Court considers the prevention principle
Construction contract or product warranty? Not all collateral warranty disputes can be adjudicated
When you think the amount of your personal guarantee had a limit – but it didn’t.
BuildLaw Issue 44
Leaky Home Case: Failure to obtain a building report results in reduction of damages for contributory negligence
Do payment claims for retention money ‘fit’ with the standard terms of contract in New Zealand?
Resolving Construction Disputes – Is Adjudication a Good Option?
BuildLaw Issue 43
Cost certainty for resolving building and construction disputes: Extension to the BDT Adjudication Low Value Claim Scheme
Construction Contracts – Enforcement of Debts Due and Mandatory Alternative Dispute Resolution Clauses
The Enforceability of Liquidated Damages Clauses
Building and Construction Under COVID-19 Alert Level 4
Class-action lawsuit against Harditex cladding fails
What types of disputes can be referred to adjudication?
What are the cost implications of challenging an arbitral award through the courts?
Proposed Changes to the Construction Retentions Regime
Show Me the Money: Seven Things to Remember When Preparing a Payment Claim
BuildLaw Issue 42
Overhaul of Resource Management System
Experts’ duties and conflicting interests – Secretariat Consulting Pte Ltd v A Company
Payment Claims: using Xero to send out your invoices? Don’t forget the important notice
The Award of Enforcement Costs under the Construction Contracts Act 2002
High-Risk Cladding Banned In Multiple Jurisdictions
When will (and won’t) implied warranties expand the scope of works?
BuildLaw Issue 41
Construction Disputes – Are they on the rise?
BuildLaw Issue 40
Bought a house – got problems – no one wants to know?
Assessing sums payable in the absence of a contract: Electrix Limited v The Fletcher Construction Company Limited [2020] NZHC 918
BuildLaw Issue 39
BuildLaw Issue 38
Adjudication: calculating time over the Christmas period 2019-2020
What are the non-working days over the Christmas period this year?
The builder’s right to fix
The ‘collaborative’ future of construction and infrastructure procurement
Case In-Brief: Hybrid contracts and the payment provisions of the Construction Act
BuildLaw Issue 37
The Supreme Court reinstatement is not a right that can be assigned
Contractual appendices: ignore at your peril
New Government Procurement Rules Announced (4th Edition)
Building Law reforms: Raising the bar across the sector
BuildLaw Issue 36
BuildLaw Issue 35
When can you go to Adjudication?
Alliancing: what does the new NEC4 Alliance Contract have to offer?
BuildLaw Issue 34
Neutral Evaluation Revisited
Recent Posts
- And you think you may have problems with your construction contract?
- Vicarious liability and subcontractors
- Limitation for payment claims under construction contracts
- Extensions of time in construction contracts
- Construction contract procedure and dispute resolution: There really is a reason to pay attention to the boring stuff
Archives
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- November 2020
- September 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- December 2017
- September 2017
- June 2017
- March 2017
- December 2016
- September 2016
- June 2016
- March 2016