By Catherine Green.

 

Do you use Xero to send out your invoices? Make sure they are compliant payment claims under the Construction Contracts Act 2002 (Act).

The default payment regime under the Act is an efficient and effective way of getting your invoices paid. However, we still see contractors coming unstuck when they seek to rely on this regime because their payment claims are not compliant with the requirements of the Act.

Under section 20 of the Act, a payee (the party to a construction contract who is entitled to a progress payment) is entitled to serve payment claims on the payer (the party to a construction contract who is liable for that payment) for payments, including any single or final payment under the contract. To benefit from the default payment entitlements under the Act, a payee must first serve a valid payment claim on the payer. A valid payment claim must comply with the following mandatory requirements:

  • be in writing;
  • contain sufficient details to identify the construction contract to which the payment relates;
  • identify the construction work and the relevant period to which the payment relates;
  • state a claimed amount and the due date for payment;
  • indicate the manner in which the payee calculated the claimed amount; and
  • state that it is made under the Act.

It must also include the ‘Important Notice’ found at Schedule 1 of the Construction Contracts Regulations 2003.

To make sure you’re compliant you are welcome to use the free templates on the Building Disputes Tribunal website. You can find these in the Adjudication Guides and Resources Section. Just have a look at the Forms and Precedents. You can also find template payment schedules, notice of adjudication, a sample adjudication claim, and notices to suspend works. We update these documents regularly so if you want to be sure that you are in compliance with the latest requirements, be sure to check back to see the latest forms.

Lately we have also received a number of enquiries from contractors who are using Xero to issue their invoices and who aren’t sure how they can comply with the requirement to provide the ‘Important Notice’.

The good news is it’s pretty easy. You can add any documents as attachments to your invoice (payment claim) so you can simply include the ‘Important Notice’ as an attachment in Xero. Have a look at this easy to follow video from Xero on including files with online invoices to see how to do it.

Finally, don’t forget the other requirements under section 20 of the Act. To be a valid payment claim you need to tick all the boxes!

And you think you may have problems with your construction contract?

Jo O’Dea In the recent Australian case of Gemcan Constructions Pty Ltd v Westbourne Grammar School [2022] VSC 6, the Supreme Court of Victoria considered a number of issues concerning a construction payment dispute between the parties.  Technically this case was the...

Vicarious liability and subcontractors

By Sam Dorne Liability in tort depends upon proof of a personal breach of duty, with one true exception, vicarious liability. The law of negligence is generally fault based; a defendant is personally liable only for the defendant’s own negligent acts and omissions....

Limitation for payment claims under construction contracts

By Sam Dorne The decision in Hirst v Dunbar [2022] EWHC 41 (TCC) considers the impact of payment provisions in a construction contract, whether through contract or implied terms, and the commencement of the limitation period for payment claims under the contract. It...

Extensions of time in construction contracts

By Jo O’Dea   In an extension of time claim, blame for the delay was a relevant consideration when assessing what was “fair and reasonable”.   In CAJ v CAI [2021] 5 GCA 102, the Singapore Court of Appeal considered the issue of extensions of time in...

Construction contract procedure and dispute resolution: There really is a reason to pay attention to the boring stuff

By Belinda Green Failure to follow a simple construction contract procedure resulted in a hollow dispute outcome for all in Cairns Building and Construction v Kaminaras. This Queensland case reminds us that contractual processes are not just put there by lawyers to...

BuildLaw Issue 45

March 2022CONTENTS Extensions of time in construction contracts Construction contract procedure and dispute resolution: There really is a reason to pay attention to the boring stuff Principals beware, constructive acceleration is here UK: Important announcement on the...

Laying the foundations: tips on how to mediate high-profile construction disputes

By Hannah Aziz Top tips for mediating high-profile construction disputes: Tip 1: Fail to prepare, prepare to fail As with any legal dispute, preparation is key. There will likely be additional, external pressures in high-profile disputes, including publicity...

Testing the waters: New South Wales Supreme Court considers the prevention principle

By Hannah Aziz  Court provides further confirmation that the prevention principle can be excluded by the terms of a contract.   Introduction Following our recent commentary comparing the operation of the prevention principle in New South Wales and Victoria, the...

Construction contract or product warranty? Not all collateral warranty disputes can be adjudicated

By Belinda Green Collateral warranties might be parasitic on a construction contract, but that doesn’t automatically mean they are one. The individual wording and circumstances need to be considered. In some cases, like in Toppan Holdings Limited v Simply Construction...

When you think the amount of your personal guarantee had a limit – but it didn’t.

In a recent Court of Appeal case, Cancian v Carters [2021] NZCA 397, Carters sought to enforce a personal guarantee against Mr Canican.  The Court dismissed an argument from Mr Cancian that Carters had not notified him that that the limit on his personal guarantee had...