18 August 2021 | IMPORTANT NOTICE

x

In line with Ministry of Health guidance, our staff are currently working remotely. They remain available to assist and it is business as usual. However, we ask that wherever possible you contact us online or by email to registrar@buildingdisputestribunal.co.nz.

If you need to courier documents, please contact our Registry staff in the first instance to confirm the appropriate delivery details.

He waka eke noa.

By Catherine Green.

 

Do you use Xero to send out your invoices? Make sure they are compliant payment claims under the Construction Contracts Act 2002 (Act).

The default payment regime under the Act is an efficient and effective way of getting your invoices paid. However, we still see contractors coming unstuck when they seek to rely on this regime because their payment claims are not compliant with the requirements of the Act.

Under section 20 of the Act, a payee (the party to a construction contract who is entitled to a progress payment) is entitled to serve payment claims on the payer (the party to a construction contract who is liable for that payment) for payments, including any single or final payment under the contract. To benefit from the default payment entitlements under the Act, a payee must first serve a valid payment claim on the payer. A valid payment claim must comply with the following mandatory requirements:

  • be in writing;
  • contain sufficient details to identify the construction contract to which the payment relates;
  • identify the construction work and the relevant period to which the payment relates;
  • state a claimed amount and the due date for payment;
  • indicate the manner in which the payee calculated the claimed amount; and
  • state that it is made under the Act.

It must also include the ‘Important Notice’ found at Schedule 1 of the Construction Contracts Regulations 2003.

To make sure you’re compliant you are welcome to use the free templates on the Building Disputes Tribunal website. You can find these in the Adjudication Guides and Resources Section. Just have a look at the Forms and Precedents. You can also find template payment schedules, notice of adjudication, a sample adjudication claim, and notices to suspend works. We update these documents regularly so if you want to be sure that you are in compliance with the latest requirements, be sure to check back to see the latest forms.

Lately we have also received a number of enquiries from contractors who are using Xero to issue their invoices and who aren’t sure how they can comply with the requirement to provide the ‘Important Notice’.

The good news is it’s pretty easy. You can add any documents as attachments to your invoice (payment claim) so you can simply include the ‘Important Notice’ as an attachment in Xero. Have a look at this easy to follow video from Xero on including files with online invoices to see how to do it.

Finally, don’t forget the other requirements under section 20 of the Act. To be a valid payment claim you need to tick all the boxes!

BuildLaw Issue 43

September 2021CONTENTS Construction contracts: enforcement of debts due and mandatory alternative dispute resolution clauses Cost certainty for resolving building and construction disputes: extension to the BDT Adjudication Low Value Claim scheme Engineers’ corner:...

“New build” residential property interest deductions rule clarified as new tax rules are set to apply from this Friday

The Government proposed changes to the rules that allowed property owners to claim interest on loans used for residential properties as an expense against their income from those properties. These rules are set to take effect in just three days, on 1 October 2021....

Cost certainty for resolving building and construction disputes: Extension to the BDT Adjudication Low Value Claim Scheme

By Belinda Green.   One of the main barriers to dispute resolution is cost: no one wants to risk spending more than the amount they recover. With inflation and construction costs always on the rise, BDT is extending its Low Value Claim (LVC) Scheme for...

Construction Contracts – Enforcement of Debts Due and Mandatory Alternative Dispute Resolution Clauses

By Melissa Perkin. The recent High Court decision in Hellaby Resources Services Limited v Body Corporate 197281 [2021] NZHC 554 is of particular interest in the construction sector for several key reasons: it is a rare example where a stay of enforcement of summary...

The Enforceability of Liquidated Damages Clauses

Author: Melissa Perkin  Liquidated damages clauses, a common feature of construction contracts, stipulate the amount of money payable as damages for loss caused by a breach of contract, irrespective of the actual loss suffered. A recent United Kingdom decision of the...

Building and Construction Under COVID-19 Alert Level 4

For information and guidance on what building and construction work can be done at Alert Level 4: ·       Health and Safety protocols at different alert levels, visit CHASNZ COVID-19 and working at the current alert level (chasnz.org); and ·       COVID-19 guidance...

Class-action lawsuit against Harditex cladding fails

By Melissa Perkin.  A second class-action lawsuit[1] brought by a group of 144 homeowners whose homes were clad in Harditex fibre-cement cladding, has failed. The homeowners alleged that Harditex manufacturer James Hardie, between 1987 – 2005, knowingly sold defective...

What types of disputes can be referred to adjudication?

The types of dispute that can be referred to adjudication are listed below:  Default liability claim These are claims for technical non-compliance with the payment regime under the Act. Where a valid payment claim has been served by a payee on a payer and the payer...

Important Guidance on Contract Interpretation Issued by the Supreme Court

Bathurst Resources Ltd v L & M Coal Holdings Ltd [2021] NZSC 85 The Supreme Court in Bathurst Resources Ltd v L & M Coal Holdings Ltd [2021] NZSC 85 has provided important guidance on how extrinsic evidence and implied terms are used to aid interpretation of...

What are the cost implications of challenging an arbitral award through the courts?

By Maria Cole. A recent decision of the Singapore High Court shone a spotlight on indemnity costs and when they will, and won’t, be granted following the unsuccessful challenge of an arbitral award. The decision highlighted the opposite principles in place between...