18 August 2021 | IMPORTANT NOTICE


In line with Ministry of Health guidance, our staff are currently working remotely. They remain available to assist and it is business as usual. However, we ask that wherever possible you contact us online or by email to registrar@buildingdisputestribunal.co.nz.

If you need to courier documents, please contact our Registry staff in the first instance to confirm the appropriate delivery details.

He waka eke noa.

By Amy McDonald

Are you still waiting on an invoice to be paid that you sent ages ago? Have you done all the work but have nothing to show for it? Unpaid invoices can have a devastating impact on builders and subcontractors. Fortunately, the Construction Contracts Act 2002 provides the means to help get invoices paid faster. Here are 7 things to keep in mind when sending your invoice (known as a payment claim) out, to make sure you can get what you’re owed:

1. The payment claim must be in writing

This one is a definite must! Whether the contract is in writing, verbal, or a mixture of both, a phone call will not be sufficient, no matter how extensive or formal it is. Emails are safe! When in doubt, write it out.

2. It should clearly relate to the construction contract

Your payment claim must contain sufficient details to identify the construction contract that the payment relates to.

Make sure the information provided in the payment claim is enough to identify the specific construction contract for which you are claiming payment, especially if you have multiple projects with your client.

Often, identifying the particular work site is sufficient to identify the specific contract.

3. Outline work done and when it was done

Identify the construction work and the relevant period to which the payment relates.

In large projects, you may have arranged scheduled progress payments: the payment claim should identify the period you are claiming payment for. In smaller jobs, identifying the work done and when it was done is generally sufficient.

In any case, make sure you are not vague in your description of the works and identify when the works were done.

 4. Include the amount & date for payment

Clearly state the amount claimed and the date it is due for payment.

The amount indicated in the payment claim should be an exact amount you are owed, rather than a ballpark figure.

The date specified should also be set to a specific day to minimise any confusion.  Check your contract or T&Cs to see if you have already fixed a standard payment period for payment claims.

If you haven’t established anything in particular, the default period under the Act is 20 working days. You’ll need to give your client 20 working days to pay.

5. Show how the amount was calculated

Indicate clearly how you reached the sum owed in the claim.

There should be a clear description of the works carried out and the method used to calculate the amount payable. In smaller jobs, the calculation may be very simple: the bathroom floor has been completed, or you have completed 60% of the works required for the kitchen renovation.

 6. State that the claim is made under the Act

One line – Do not forget to include this sentence in full:

This is a Payment Claim made under the Construction Contracts Act 2002”.

7. It must be accompanied by a written notice commonly known as Form 1:

This notice describes the process for responding to the payment claim and explains the consequences of not responding or not paying. It also explains how to respond to it. This notice may change from time to time. Make sure you always use the latest version.


Finally, check the Guides and Resources page our website for more information. You can download a template for a Payment Claim here. If you want to go straight to the source, you can read more in the official legislation website.

About the Author: Amy McDonald

Photo Amy

Hi, my name is Amy and I’m one of the registrars at the Building Disputes Tribunal. We help streamline the process when you need help with a dispute from a construction contract. We also write blogs with the aim of making the things like the Construction Contracts Act easier to understand and use in your daily life. If you work in construction, using the Act can help you out of some tricky situations – and that’s where we can help!



The information contained in this article is for reference purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Please consult with a lawyer if you are unsure of your rights and obligations under the Construction Contracts Act 2002 or any other relevant legislation.


Send a copy to my inbox

* indicates required

Cost certainty for resolving building and construction disputes: Extension to the BDT Adjudication Low Value Claim Scheme

By Belinda Green.   One of the main barriers to dispute resolution is cost: no one wants to risk spending more than the amount they recover. With inflation and construction costs always on the rise, BDT is extending its Low Value Claim (LVC) Scheme for...

Construction Contracts – Enforcement of Debts Due and Mandatory Alternative Dispute Resolution Clauses

By Melissa Perkin. The recent High Court decision in Hellaby Resources Services Limited v Body Corporate 197281 [2021] NZHC 554 is of particular interest in the construction sector for several key reasons: it is a rare example where a stay of enforcement of summary...

The Enforceability of Liquidated Damages Clauses

Author: Melissa Perkin  Liquidated damages clauses, a common feature of construction contracts, stipulate the amount of money payable as damages for loss caused by a breach of contract, irrespective of the actual loss suffered. A recent United Kingdom decision of the...

Building and Construction Under COVID-19 Alert Level 4

For information and guidance on what building and construction work can be done at Alert Level 4: ·       Health and Safety protocols at different alert levels, visit CHASNZ COVID-19 and working at the current alert level (chasnz.org); and ·       COVID-19 guidance...

Class-action lawsuit against Harditex cladding fails

By Melissa Perkin.  A second class-action lawsuit[1] brought by a group of 144 homeowners whose homes were clad in Harditex fibre-cement cladding, has failed. The homeowners alleged that Harditex manufacturer James Hardie, between 1987 – 2005, knowingly sold defective...